Author Archives: hawthornecht

National Review and the Grand Conspiracy

Salon published an article from a pedophile who argued he was born that way and works hard (I guess) to not commit a crime.

Lets leave that argument alone (I didn’t read it)–it was on Salon after all.  Lets, for the purpose here, say, he has a right to express his opinion, Salon has a right to publish it, and in our slippery slope world, the Right basically said this would follow so no reason to faint.

National Review revisited the term Cuckservative this past weekend, and the #nrorevolt was back on.

Yet with all eyes of the altright on National Review, Charles Cooke– an atheist British immigrant–wrote a defense of the Salon article, claiming it was not in support of pedophilia.

Setting his argument aside (I haven’t read it)–WTF?  National Review?

Advertisements

Kid Rock defends the Confederate Flag–Copperheads to the Rescue Eternal

I am not one to post a “news” article as a blog post, so when I do it, as I am doing here, it is to make a point about how it’s done up North.  In Social Justice Warrior speak, this is a great example of cultural appropriation, which conservative Southerners should ‘ideologically’ oppose, but of course they don’t because Copperheads have always been the best defenders of the South.

Kid Rock and the Confederate Flag

l

…and the Grand Conspiracy

Kinsists and the general alt right were always sympathetic to the Duggars and for that matter, any reality television stars that pushed the correct ideas–if the Duggars were of a particular sort of eccentric television act with their many children.

With news that the eldest child dabbled in the taboo, yet the fam pressed on with a television show, one wonders if the whole thing was a put up job with the great reveal always in the works–the employment of the eldest son in disrepute with the Family Research Council (see the Evil General Boykin employment @FRC) only encourages a deeper skepticism and thoughts of the Grand Conspiracy.

From my tiny perch, I ask what sort of father, posing as a Christian Conservative, would risk the psyche of his first born son for a tele program–and that is America, in the year I found her–2015.

The Grand Conspiracy is always more true then we want to believe.

More Ghosts of Waco

Mike McNulty made two important documentaries during the 1990s on the siege and massacre at Waco. The first documentary, Rules of Engagement, was up for an Oscar; it was attacked by both the Patriot Right and the State, suggesting it might be worth seeing. His follow up, A New Revelation, entered proof of the State firing on the Davidians including shots from Lon Horiuchi. Two additional items, the presence of Delta Force at Waco, and the role Hillary Clinton and Vince Foster played in the massacre were documented.

When the State finally set up a slightly more independent investigatory body, headed by Senator John Danforth, an Episcopalian minister, McNulty was a thorn in his side, turning his FLIR material over to the investigation. The lead expert, Carlos Ghigliotti, died.

McNulty last made the news cycle suggesting a new project, one that would target Eric Holder and Hillary Clinton. Mike McNulty passed away last week Feb 24-25.  (Update: Feb 20th.)

In entirely unrelated news in Missouri Republican Gubernatorial politics, Tom Schweich, who was to challenge for the Republican Governor’s nomination, and who had alleged anti-Semitism from the Missouri State GOP last November, committed suicide on Feb. 26

Prior to becoming a Missouri state civil servant/politician, Schweich had worked on anti-drug policy in Afghanistan (i.e. managing the drug trade); before that he worked for Senator Danforth in the UN, and before that, he helped Senator Danforth’s Waco investigation.

Just a juxtaposition, not an insinuation that this has anything to do with a possible Hillary Clinton, or another Bush, campaign.

Rest in peace, Mike McNulty.

The Strange New World of Chris Ruddy Revisited

Chris Ruddy was a tabloid reporter running the populist Democrat angle at the NY Post who was encouraged, allegedly by Reed Irvine, to pursue the death of Vincent Foster.  After a few articles, Reed got cold feet and quit the search, while others continued hot pursuit–and Ruddy saw his star rising.

CIA operative and benefactor, Richard Mellon Scaife, offered to privately fund Ruddy’s pursuit of the Foster case and soon, ‘NewsMax’ was born, and Ruddy had a book published.  With many competitors in the Vince Foster investigation, Ruddy attempted to find his own niche, a focus on a wine (or wine cooler–again, memory fades) bottle found near the body that Ruddy suggested might have contained poison as well as an argument about where the body was actually found.

When Patrick Knowlton, a witness at Fort Marcy Park who went against the government line, complained of harassment from various enforcers he thought was government, he hired an attorney who pursued recourse.  This is when Ruddy broke the narrative and questioned the motives of Knowlton’s attorney.  Ruddy’s main interest, it seemed was to keep a raw partisan view on the Foster case.

And so, it came with only a passingly strange a-hem, that Chris Ruddy is donating $1 million to a Clinton Foundation.

Anti-Vaxxers, Vaxxers, Rand Paul and Amnesty/Immigration/Easy Entry

Rand Paul has taken a calculated and necessary stand on the otherwise narrow, and occasionally popular position amongst the Upper Middle Class, of vaccines. As a Doctor, and Constitutionalist, he has the unique identity to strike a proper tone as being something more than a drug agent for Big Pharma.
The Anti-Vaxxer Coalition has the marks of a potentially Traditionalist network, as they reject the perceived wisdom of the Technocrats. Generally, they see the goblin in Big Pharma.
The world of the 1950s accepted that we were not all equal, and that a grand goal (e.g. eliminating polio) might cost a few lives, a few eggs broken (these are Beyond Left and Right positions) but the great goal was worth it. The Classical Liberal would just argue that so long as one can sue for unlimited damages, then such a system could function (of course, regulatory capture, and far worse, insures the otherwise.)
For the paleo, it is pointless to speak to the Vaxxers on their terms, but as metaphysicians, both groups have elements that might begin to understand that it is in their interest to make the connection, that Amnesty, Easy Travel, Increased Immigration and so forth is incompatible with the Anti-Vaxxer position.
There are laws on the book—being completely ignored—that prevent those with communicable diseases, or those coming from a region with a communicable disease—from easy entry.
The argument is twofold: The State (which includes Big Pharma) has an interest in more “customers” and has a diabolical interest in raising the fear of Third World disease and presenting “technology” as a defense.
On the other front, one cannot let in millions of foreigners from every part of the globe and expect those populations who refuse vaccines to thrive or find safety in their gated communities or rural enclaves.
Rand Paul, and really, the anti-Vaxxers should thus be challenged on that front.