Monthly Archives: November 2014

Rudy Giuliani Getting Ferguson Right

File this under “giving credit where credit is due.” I’m not a big fan of Giuliani because of his foreign policy hawkishness and his social liberalism. I was especially ticked at him when he grandstanded in the debate against Ron Paul on the issue of blowback. (Which actually ended up backfiring on him significantly.) But you can’t deny that the guy has a pair of nads. Twice recently he has defied the mob on Michael Brown.

First, he went after the “black lives don’t matter” mantra by pointing out the very high black on black crime rates, which the PC peddlers don’t riot about. Importantly, once he said it, he stood his ground. The worse thing you can do when combating the forces of PC is give ground. Of course the liberals went bonkers, but I saw at least two stories from liberal or mainstream (same thing) sources saying that … well … ummm … Giuliani was right.

Now he makes a point publicly that I have been making all along. The case against Officer Wilson should have never even gone to the grand jury. He should have been clear before it, because there clearly was no case. Fort the record, once again, yours truly is a “thought leader.” That sound you hear is me patting myself on the back. 😉

…former New York City mayor Rudy Giuliani said on Sunday that prosecutors shouldn’t have tried to indict him in front of a grand jury in the first place. Doing so, according to Giuliani, was political theater.

“I don’t see how this case normally would even have been brought to a grand jury,” said Giuliani, a former prosecutor, on Fox News Sunday. “This is the kind of case—had it not had the racial overtones and the national publicity—where a prosecutor would have come to the conclusion that there is not enough evidence to present to the grand jury.”

On a related “giving credit where credit is due” note, I don’t have much use for Rep. Peter King (R-NY) because he is an uber-hawk, but he stirred the Michael Brown pot recently as well, by suggesting that Obama should invite Officer Darren Wilson to the White House.

Rumor has it that Giuliani is considering another Presidential run in 2016. I won’t support him for obvious reasons, but I’ll admit I’m inclined to be less hard on him.

Roger Stone is on the (Clinton) Case

Oh yeah! From a recent Roger Stone Facebook post:

Bill Clinton has no degree from Oxford. The Rhode Scholar Rapist was tossed out of Oxford for raping 19 year old Emily Wellstone, beginning a pattern that will make Bill Cosby look like a boy scout- COMING SOON in my next book “The Clinton’s War on Women’ – Skyhorse 2015

My Email to the Big Mountain Club

Shame on the Big Mountain Club for endorsing the efforts of a Soros funded group of Cultural Marxist PC thought enforcers. You could have washed your hands of the situation involving Spencer and Scheunemann without endorsing a group of PC enforcing thugs. I thought Montana was supposed to be a land of rugged. manly, Western men known for their independence and courage. Well that image is obviously mistaken in your case , because y’all just kissed up to a group shilling an East and West Coast attitude of no tolerance of deviation from approved groupthink. Turn in your Montana man cards. Y’all just forfeited the right to carry them.


Richard Spencer vs. Randy Scheunemann, an Update

There has been some new developments in the case of Richard Spencer, Randy Scheunemann and the private ski club to which they both belonged. This story has been around for a while. I’m pretty sure we covered it before. Probably on the pre-crash site. I’m pretty sure that Spencer has given his side before. I won’t recap it here because Spencer re-tells the story at length in this new post at Radix Journal.

What has changed since this situation first came up, is that a group has formed in Montana to protest the presence of Richard Spencer in their community, a development we covered here. How they got wind of this and why the situation came to a head a bit after the story first broke, I don’t know. The outcome of the original story was that Scheunemann had quit the private ski club in protest, and Spencer remained on as a member. The new development is that Spencer has now resigned from the ski club as well. As with a lot of resignations, one could be excused for assuming there might be more to the story. (Chuck Hagel anyone?) Was Spencer asked to leave? Was it made known to him that life at the club would be unpleasant for him if he remained?

The Big Mountain Club has responded to the situation. While the club’s response confirms in some respects Spencer’s side of the story and confirms that Scheunemann was, shall we say, misremembering events, it is otherwise craven PC a** kissing. They say they “applaud and support” the efforts of the PC thought enforcers Love Lives Here.

From the Whitefish Pilot story:

The resort says the Big Mountain Club is not a political organization and will remain that way.

“That being the case, we won’t tolerate hate or inappropriate conduct,” the resort notes.

“Any suggestion that the Big Mountain Club has sided with a white supremacist in this matter is false, defamatory and contrary to what the Big Mountain Club and Whitefish Mountain Resort stand for.”

The resort says it stands behind the local group Love Lives Here in the Flathead Valley, which organized a rally Nov. 17 to ask Whitefish City Council to pass a “no hate” ordinance.

“Indeed it is the individuals of the community who can and should have the most impactful voice on a topic of this nature and Whitefish Mountain Resort and the Big Mountain Club appreciate, applaud and support their efforts to highlight the amount of love and tolerance in our community.”

In other words, the club supports the efforts of a Soros funded (thanks to Hawthorne for this intel) group intended to stamp out dissent and make us all good little PC thought slaves. I’ll concede that the club has an interest in not having itself in the headlines on a story like this, but to openly embrace the Cultural Marxist jihadists is cowardly and pathetic and was unnecessary. They could have easily washed their hands of the incident without cutting off their intellectual balls and handing them to Love Lives Here.

Their contact page is here. I encourage everyone reading this to contact them and call them out for their cowardly PC cave in.

More on the Cosby Clinton Rape Allegation Connection the Media Refuses to Make

This is a follow-up to my previous post.* Others are noticing.

Here is Matt Walsh at The Blaze.

Here is Bob Allen at Political Outcast.

* For those wondering why I didn’t just update my previous post, once a post falls so far down the screen, it doesn’t get looked at much. I really want everyone to read Walsh’s article. Not only does he make the Clinton connection, he also calls out the entertainment industry for their double standard in dropping Cosby like a hot potato but having no problem with Roman Polanski or Bryan Singer. Take a look at it.

Scientist James Watson is Selling His Noble Prize Post PC Ostracization

James Watson, who co-discovered DNA, is selling his Nobel Prize for the money. His sources of income have dried up following his banishment for the crime of venturing a perfectly plausible scientific opinion.

Read the story. It’s clear that Watson is not starving or homeless when you see what he wants to do with the money, but still, this whole episode is absurd.

I Didn’t Realize Judge Napolitano Was Now on the PC Thoughtcriminal List

I didn’t know Judge Nap had incurred the wrath of the PC thought police, or at least any more than any other rightish libertarian of some renown, but apparently he has. You see, the Judge has been identified as a Confederate apologist by the guardians of rightthink, and Ran Paul is supposedly to be faulted for writing a forward for Judge Nap’s book. Wow, the PC police get to target two birds with one stone here, the Judge and Rand Paul. (Three actually, because Jack Hunter’s thoroughly beaten Southern Avenger corpse gets dug back up for a few more good whacks)

Judge Nap is really good on most issues except immigration where he has swallowed the open borders libertarian Kool-Aid, although he has been good on calling out Obama on his executive amnesty. But go here and buy his book just to spite MediaMatters, which you might recall was founded by our old friend David Brock of Am Spec Troopergate fame.

There’s a lot here, so just a few thoughts. So David Brock now thinks it was disreputable to publish well sourced stories about Clinton’s shenanigan’s with women, the truth of which was confirmed in the case of “Paula,” and hasn’t really been seriously challenged otherwise on truthfulness grounds, as far as I know, but it’s perfectly OK to police thoughts so that groupthink will not be challenged? Mr. Brock has a strange sense of what honest journalism is supposed to be about. Apparently it is to reinforce conventional wisdom rather than challenge the powers that be.

Second, you see how much good Rand’s pandering on race has done him. He’s still a thoughtcriminal because he writes a forward for Judge Nap and once employed you know who. Jack Hunter gets dragged up again because Nap defended him when he was the subject of the thoughtpolicer’s two minute hate, despite the fact that Jack has been bending over backwards to prove he’s not a wrongthinker, as anyone who follows his output at Rare or is Facebook friends with him knows. So how’s that working for you Rand and Jack?

Lastly, I think one reason certain libertarians who ought to know better gravitate to the open borders position is because they think it inoculates them from the charge of wrongthink. I don’t know if this is Judge Nap’s motivation or if he just really buys the whole open borders libertarian foolishness, but if it is, I’ll ask him the same question I asked Rand and Jack. “How’s that working for you.” (With acknowledgement to Dr. Phil.) In the eyes of the rightthink enforcers, if you are a thoughtcriminal in one area you are a thoughtcriminal in total, so the inoculation game is never going to work.

Ann Coulter Hits it Out of the Park on Ferguson

When Ann Coulter is good, she’s really, really good.

Evidently, the sum-total of what every idiot on TV knows about the law is Judge Sol Wachtler’s 20-year-old joke that a prosecutor could “indict a ham sandwich.” We’re supposed to be outraged that this prosecutor didn’t indict the ham sandwich of Darren Wilson.

Liberals seem not to understand that they don’t have a divine right to ruin someone’s life and bankrupt him with a criminal trial, just so they’re satisfied.

The reason most grand jury investigations result in an indictment is that most grand juries aren’t convened solely to patronize racial mobs. Missouri Gov. Jay Nixon was basically demanding an indictment of Wilson before Big Mike’s body was cold. It was only because of racial politics that this shooting wasn’t dismissed without a grand jury, at all.

Thank you Ann. This is the point I have been making all along. The libs are whining because there was no indictment, but had the case not been so polarized by the locals and the national media, there likely wouldn’t have even been a grand jury. The DA obviously didn’t think Wilson was guilty, or at least knew there was no way he was going to get a conviction, so his taking the case before the grand jury was likely simply an act of appeasement itself. But libs aren’t satisfied with that. They want to be appeased with a trial. But it is incredibly naïve to believe they would be happy with a trial and a not guilty verdict. They want a guilty verdict, facts be damned. Officer Wilson needs to pay for the collective sins of whitey.